References Used in the Presentation

  1. Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model?. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 38-46.
  2. Anthony, L. (2000). Structure and linguistic features of research article titles in computer science. The bulletin of Okayama University of Science, 35/B, 47-54. Okayama, Japan: Okayama University of Science.
  3. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman.
  4. Carrell, P. & Joan C. Eisterhold. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4):553-573.
  5. Coe, R. M. (1994). Teaching genre as process. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Learning and teaching genre (pp. 157-169). Portsmouth, NJ: Boyton/Cook.
  6. Currie, P. (1994). What counts as good writing? Enculturation and writing assessment. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Learning and teaching genre (pp. 63-79). Portsmouth, NJ: Boyton/Cook.
  7. Freedman, A. (1994). ‘Do as I say’: The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 191-210). London: Taylor and Francis.
  8. Hinds, J. (1982). Japanese conversational structure. Lingua 57, 301-326.
  9. Hinds, J. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text, 3, 83-195.
  10. Hoey, M. (1994). Signaling in discourse: a functional analysis of a common discourse pattern in written and spoken English. In M. Coulthard (Ed.) Advances in Text analysis (pp. 26-45). London: Routledge.
  11. Hunt, R. A. (1994). Traffic in genres, in classrooms and out. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 211-230). London: Taylor and Francis.
  12. Johns, A. M. & Dudley-Evans, T. (1991). English for specific purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 297-314.
  13. Miller, C. R. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 23-42). London: Taylor and Francis.
  14. Pare, A. & Smart G. (1994). Observing genres in action: Towards a research methodology. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 146-154). London: Taylor and Francis.
  15. Richardson, P. W. (1994). Language as personal resource and as social construct: Competing views of literacy pedagogy in Australia. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.) Learning and teaching genre (pp. 117-142). Portsmouth, NJ: Boyton/Cook.
  16. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.
  17. van Naerssen, M. (2000). Comments made on the TESP-L internet discussion list.
  18. Weissberg, R. C. (1984). Given and new: Paragraph development models from scientific English. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 485-500.
  19. Winter, Eugene. (1994). Clause relations as information structure: two basic text structures in English. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Text analysis (pp. 46-68). London: Routledge.